Reflections on Our Battle for Buses
This is a time to take a hard look at the real issues and costs we are facing, beyond all of the political and campaign rhetoric. In the end, it is inevitable that if Prop 1 fails, a significant number of bus riders who depend on this system will not be able to get to where they need to go.
Why then is there opposition? The Tacoma and Bonney Lake City Councils represent the two opposing sides of division over this issue.
There is validity in the other side’s argument. The inherent problem with tax-funded activities is that it is the PEOPLE who fund them. Regardless of your viewpoint on taxes, everyone must admit that if you pay money, you have some right to speak your mind regarding HOW that money is used.
So how has Pierce Transit used that money?
Someone once said, “In my mind, the greatest waste of money year after year is the top-heavy and swollen bureaucracy in the public school system,” where “top-heavy” referred to the proliferation of complicated red tape and too many overly inflated salaries. In other words, money for nothing.
Are we seeing that today in our transportation sector?
The greatest overhead cost to any business is almost always labor. Sure enough, payroll at Pierce Transit grew over 18% from 2005-2009. While this was lower than some neighboring government agencies, analysis showed that this was larger than private sector counterparts.
This means a larger piece of the tax pie is going to fund wages and benefits for government-employed workers.
Critics complain that Pierce Transit’s drivers and other Amalgamated Transit Union members received a 4 percent cost-of-living increase last summer, even as the agency struggled to balance its budget.
Of course, Pierce Transit has been “honor-bound” to its contracts with unions. Now we start to see the big picture. Union activities are highly susceptible to changes in tax-funding. They are also highly mobilized and effective ingetting things done.
This is not an argument against unions. Unions are critical to the preservation of labor rights. There are an important facet of American society and our economy. However, we must face reality. If the choice comes between preserving wages and benefits, or preserving essential services for those in need, the decision must unequivocally be the latter.
As a health-care provider, 60% or MORE of our clients will not be able to attend adult day health services that provide them necessary social, physical and occupational therapies if their mode of transportation is taken away. Many other providers will have to deal with the same situation. We have to look beyond our bottom-lines and honestly ask “what will this do those people who are in need…”
Taxing people who are unemployed and underemployed to fund six-figure salaries for bus drivers and other transit employees is not a desirable nor effective use of our tax money. But we need to recognize that Prop 1 is not simply about governmental tax increases. It’s about preserving essential services. There is no reason that we should not work towards preserving these services while ALSO reducing the tax burden on our more vulnerable populations.
How do we do that? Pierce Transit must take the unpopular step of taking a stronger hand in its negotiation with the unions. And the unions must realize that, just like everybody else in the private sector, their wages are subject to the reality of the times. No one wants to see a pay cut or pay freeze, and no one wants to give up their benefits or their position. But in the government money doesn’t appear out of thin air. Pierce Transit has a choice to make between its ridership and clients, or the unions and employees. Pierce Transit’s priority should be to its ridership and clients.
So when we say to support Prop 1, make no mistake, we are not in support of ineffective use of taxpayer money. But we realize that the core issue at stake in the battle over Prop 1 is first and foremost to maintain critical services for people in need. Pass Prop 1, AND THEN let’s make a concerted effort to reduce public sector wages/benefits, reduce union influence and control, and increase oversight and monitoring of our tax funds so that services remain in place while also helping alleviate that economic burden on those in economic need.












